Community Recs Post!

Nov. 20th, 2025 10:13 am
glitteryv: (Default)
[personal profile] glitteryv posting in [community profile] recthething
Every Thursday, we have a community post, just like this one, where you can drop a rec or five in the comments.

This works great if you only have one rec and don't want to make a whole post for it, or if you don't have a DW account, or if you're shy. ;)

(But don't forget: you can deffo make posts of your own seven days a week. ;D!)

So what cool fancrafts/fanvids/fics/fanart/podfics/other kinds of fanworks have we discovered this week? Drop it in the comments below. Anon comment is enabled.

BTW, AI fanworks are not eligible for reccing at recthething. If you aware that a fanwork is AI-generated, please do not rec it here
lucymonster: (books)
[personal profile] lucymonster
This is the sequel to Vera Wong's Unsolicited Advice for Murderers, which I read and enjoyed a few months ago. My last review is here, but to recap: Vera is bored and lonely middle-aged woman who runs a tea shop in San Francisco's Chinatown. She inserts herself into a murder investigation, adopts a gaggle of lost Zoomer ducklings, and is in general a nosy, pushy, endearingly batty character with glowing good intentions and a knack for getting shit done. I absolutely love her as a character and in principle I am very on board with her becoming a new detective character in an ongoing book series.

I just ... I think this new book may have stretched itself a bit too far. I hate even saying that, because I LOVE Sutanto for the topic she chose to tackle and I do actually believe there's a place for playful approaches to serious issues. Not everyone has it in them to read heavy misery lit or dark real-world thrillers (hi, it's me, I'm Not Everyone) but still wants to broaden their awareness of the world and its many dark sides. There was a lot in this book that really did work, but the way it all resolved just broke my suspension of disbelief.

I'm talking circles around the issue, so let's be upfront: this is a cosy amateur sleuthing novel about a human trafficking ring.

That's not a spoiler. One of the major characters is introduced very early on as someone who has been trafficked; the tension comes from wondering exactly how Vera will solve the mystery, rather than any suspense over what the solution will be. What I will say without revealing any more specifics is that the stakes are just too high. Vera is a character well suited to investigating accidents or isolated crimes within her neighbourhood; she's not equipped to tackle major organised crime. The believable version of this story ended with Vera dead or in witness protection.

But like I said, I do love that Sutanto took this beast by the horns and decided she was going to make her audience ride it with her. I think human trafficking is one of those subjects where popular awareness is sensationalised, borderline eroticised - we picture the Taken style of kidnappers snatching up conventionally attractive young women to staff their glamorous brothels - but far more common in reality are boring-ugly horror stories of impoverished, undereducated people ensnared by employment scams and forced to do shitty, menial work under abusive conditions. This book really understands that, and has enormous respect and compassion for trafficking victims, especially those who are then coerced to behave in less than prosocial ways themselves. It's also a quick, compelling read that despite its dark focus captures much of the magic and fun of the first book. I don't not recommend it. Come love Vera Wong with me, guys! Just ... I don't know, be ready for some tonal whiplash in this one.

The epilogue has Vera jetting off to France. I hope the next instalment in the series will be a hilarious Parisian caper that takes full advantage of its intensified culture clash possibilities.
glitteryv: (Default)
[personal profile] glitteryv
Apology for Murder

A 1945 movie from Sigmund Neufeld Productions that was directed by Sam Newfield. Based on Billy Wilder and Raymond Chandler's script for Double Indemnity AND the James M. Cain novel of the same name.

Kenny (played by Hugh Beaumont) is a hot shot journalist who tries to land a surprise interview with businessman Harvey (played by Russell Hicks). He's brushed off but, while trying to interview Harvey, Kenny meets Toni (played by Ann Savage), Harvey's wife.

They have a type of ~connection.

Soon enough, they start having an affair. One night, Toni brings up how beneficial it'd be to get rid of her husband . . .

If the story sounds VAGUELY FAMILIAR, it's cuz this is a v. condensed version of Double Indemnity. Only, like, at a lower budget. This movie is abt an hour and 4 mins long.

A generous way to think of this movie is as an hourlong episode of a TV anthology show. Comparing it to the original movie is deeply unfair.


Do I have any criticisms?

Because of its length, it jumps over a lot of the actual!plot. Frex, Kenny and Toni's affair happens super fast. There's no time for anything to develop.


Do I recommend it?

Yeah. It might be a movie that's not amazing, but it's also a blatant rip-off of a much better movie. AFAIK, it's available on Amazon Prime Video, but I'm also sure anyone can find it elsewhere online. I'm giving it a 2.7 out of 5.


Queerness level:

Nonexistent.
glitteryv: (Default)
[personal profile] glitteryv
Dead Reckoning

A 1947 movie from Columbia Pictures. Directed by John Cromwell. Script was by Stve Fisher and Oliver H.P. Garret from a story by Gerald Drayson Adams and Sidney Bidell.

Captain Warren "Rip" Murdock (played by Humphrey Bogart) and his bestie Sergeant Johnny Drake (played by William Prince) are enroute to Washington, D.C. from Paris under some mystery orders. Soon enough, though, they find out that Johnny will be awarded the Medal of Honor while Murdock will get the Distinguished Service Cross. Murdock is elated while Johnny is not quite vibing with all of that.

When their train makes a stop, Johnny uses the opportunity to run away. Murdock tells the army that he's gonna go after his BFF and bring him back. He decides to head on over to Gulf City, Johnny's hometown, and ends up getting a message from Johnny that they gotta talk. But Johnny never contacts him again . . .

Released a whole year after the triumph that was The Big Sleep, this is a pretty solid B-movie.

OFC, Bogart is THE star: he brings a realistic combination of world-weariness and hope for a better future that, combined with the superb dialogue, makes the film snap and crackle with energy. Most of the cast is really good as well.

The plot is convoluted enough to make it interesting w/o becoming too labyrinthine.


Do I have any criticisms?

Even though I think she's a good actress in most things, I couldn't quite rally behind Lizabeth Scott as Coral Chandler. Thing is, I'm not sure even Scott knew HOW to play her character. And so she was both femme fatale and heroine without making up her mind. Which makes me think that the role would've been a much better fit for someone else.

Interestingly enough, this seems to be the general sentiment as folks (even going back to 1947) felt, at best, lukewarm with her performance. *Hands*


Do I recommend it?

I do! Again, it's no The Big Sleep and Lizabeth Scott is no Lauren Baccall, but I was entertained. This movie is available for streaming on YouTube for FREE NINETY-NINE for the month of November IF you've got YT Premium, you'll be able to watch it w/o ads. I give it a 3.5 out of 5.


Queerness level:

There's a v. OJO line that Murdock tells another character abt his bond with Johnny that falls along the line of "he's the person I've loved the most."

Now, I wouldn't go as far as to say that the slash vibes are strong, BUT Murdock's devotion (in a manner of speaking) to Johnny does ring a little queer. IDK.


Le trailer

bobby nash icons

Nov. 14th, 2025 11:14 am
svgurl: (stock: lighthouse)
[personal profile] svgurl
I made Bobby Nash (9-1-1) icons for the [community profile] seasons_of_fandom 'the graveyard' challenge.

icons )

glitteryv: (Default)
[personal profile] glitteryv
Johnny O'Clock

A 1947 movie from J.E.M. Productions directed by Robert Rossen.

Johnny O'Clock (played by Dick Powell) co-runs a casino alongside Guido Marchettis (S.Thomas Gomez). He's a guy who knows all the angles, moves, scams, and whatnot. Harriet (played by Nina Foch), a hat-check girl, is someone Johnny's friendly with. She happens to be in a volatile relationship with crooked cop!Chuck Blayden (played by Jim Bannon).

Things get v. complicated when Blayden disappears and Harriet is found dead.

AND THEN, Nancy (played by Evelyn Keyes), Harriet's sister, shows up wanting answers. Not to mention the dangerous mess that is Nell (played by Ellen Drew), Guido's wife, who won't let Johnny go.

ON TOP OF ALL THAT, there's a cop named Koch (played by Lee J. Cobb) who keeps clashing with Johnny. (Personally, I got the feeling he was envious or jealous of him? #Unsure)

This is a CHAOTIC story, hahah. Everyone's acting is on deck. Dick Powell is someone who I first met in musicals, so it wasn't until much later that I discovered his noir movies. In this case, he plays the part really well. The film has extremely snappy dialogue, the kind that calls attention to itself. The artificiality of it all actually works; EVERYONE has at least two lines that are ridic witty.

It's a v. interesting noir.


Do I have any criticisms?

The story's kinda convoluted. There's the mystery of Harriet's death, the disappearance of the crooked cop, the mobster's wife who is obsessed with Johnny, and the viewer is never quite sure WHAT KIND OF CHARACTER Johnny actually is. OTOH, he's not a villain, but he's not an anti-hero either.

There's a scene where another character calls him out for being the type of person who not only will never pick a side, but who is also deeply selfish. And Johnny shrugs that character off. I do agree with that character's assessment of Johnny cuz, FWIW, you're never quite sure of his motivations. Even after finding out abt his background and how he ended up as a casino co-owner.

Finally, Powell has some chemistry with Evelyn Kayes (who I know as the wife in The Seven Year Itch movie with Marilyn Monroe.) But it's not strong enough.


Do I recommend it?

Sure. I had a good time watching it despite the jumbled plot and my ??? abt Johnny and Koch's motivations. I think you can watch it on Tubi (plus additional copies floating on YouTube.) Gonna give it a 2.9 out of 5


Queerness level:

None.


Le trailer

lucymonster: (books)
[personal profile] lucymonster
The upside of being stupidly busy is that, somewhat counterintuitively, I end up getting lots more reading done; I'm too tired by the end of the day to socialise or catch up on chores or pursue any of my usual hobbies, so I might as well curl up with a book till lights-out time. In the past week and a bit I've wolfed down several books based on Dreamwidth chatter and really enjoyed all of them! Thoughts below.

Piranesi by Susanna Clark: I've been meaning to read this ever since that time earlier this year when we were all making book lists, and virtually everyone seemed to be including it on theirs. The description - guy lives in magical house full of ocean, wanders around discovering endless rooms - did not sound especially gripping to me. But oh, the execution! I think this is a book that, by the necessity of avoiding spoilers, it's really almost impossible to pitch in terms of its actual plot. Cleverer readers than me have tried, and I'm not going to poorly duplicate their efforts here. But I will just say that the experience of reading it was exquisite. The prose was beautiful in its simplicity: I could taste the brine, hear the waves, see the towering marble. The protagonist was a rare example of childlike innocence done in a way that's genuinely touching, never twee. The mystery of the house was gripping, the sense of building tension was deliciously awful, and the bittersweet ending tore a hole in my heart that's still aching days later.

The Only Good Indians by Stephen Graham Jones: This is literary horror about a group of Blackfeet men haunted by the murderous spirit of a pregnant elk who they killed on a hunt many years ago. A better description is here via [personal profile] pauraque; their review convinced me to give it a try, and I'm glad I did. I had to work for it. SGJ's prose is assertive and heavily sylised in the way that I always seem to stumble over in litfic written by men (which, admittedly, isn't often; I don't know if Rough Tough Manly Man Words are endemic to the whole genre or just to the books whose concepts I find interesting enough to reach for). It took me time to get into the flow of it and for the first few chapters I thought I would probably DNF. The pacing also sags in the middle; the first and final acts are electrifying, but in between them is a long stretch of meandering reflection on cultural identity and generational trauma that rather bleeds away the tension. I actually really like the idea of two horrors intertwining - the white-hot shock of being pursued by a vengeful supernatural entity, versus the numbing daily violence of systemic racism - but the balance between the two was off. I wish that section had been tightened up a bit.

There's some reasonably high impact gore, most of it directed at animals, but even as a squeamish softie I agree with pauraque that it felt necessary and effective. No children are killed or permanently harmed. (I include that mild spoiler because without it I'd have quit the book.) My few gripes not withstanding, this was a chewy, thought-provoking read with a pleasantly scary atmosphere and a villain who I genuinely loved and cared for so much despite all the killing.

Katabasis by RF Kuang: A confession: I had written off this author based entirely on internet hearsay until [personal profile] troisoiseaux convinced me to give her a chance. I think possibly there's a benefit to arriving late on the scene of any new cultural phenomenon. The readers who've heard Kuang built up as a genius have had the understandable hype-backlash response; I've had time to digest their backlash, come in with greatly lowered expectations, and rediscover the hype for myself in a more organic way than those who were fed the promise of Groundbreaking Literature. Katabasis is not groundbreaking anything. It's an indulgent piece of pop academia in a similar vein to The Good Place, where deep scholarly questions of philosophy and religion (and also, in this case, logic and maths) are deliberately given the most superficial treatment possible for the sake of entertainment. It's a witty, quick-for-its-length romp of a story about two PhD students of magic journeying through Hell to rescue the soul of their abusive former advisor so they can graduate. Like the SGJ book it sagged in the middle; the first and last few levels of Hell were delightfully imaginative (I especially liked the sinners sentenced to work on their dissertations for eternity, never passing or receiving any feedback that could help them pass) but the middle couple were so perfunctory and unimaginative that I genuinely think Kuang must have just run out of ideas for satirical hellscapes. But the rest of the book was enough fun to be worth enduring that lull. I loved the magic system in all its dry, pedantic detail, and I loved the idea that magic could be real and end up occupying much the same space in our culture as linguistics or advanced mathematics: theoretically impressive and prestigious, but in practice an academic circlejerk whose real world applications are barely understood by anyone outside the bubble.

A lot of the online discourse I've seen about this book has centred on spoilers, and my thoughts thereon )

More slight spoilers, cw: abuse )

So this wasn't a life-changing read and I'm not rushing out to buy myself a permanent copy, but I did thoroughly enjoy the experience, enough to then also pick up:

Yellowface by RF Kuang: When Athena, a young literary darling of Chinese descent, dies in a freakish mishap, her white friend June - also a novelist, though massively less successful - steals her latest manuscript and passes it off as her own. The manuscript in question? A deeply sensitive, passionately angry, very much Own Voices oriented story about the WWI Chinese Labour Corps. June reworks the story to include a bunch of noble white allies, remakes her authorial persona to be racially ambiguous, and launches herself towards literary stardom with all the reckless confidence of Icarus charging headlong at the sun.

More thoughts )
glitteryv: (Default)
[personal profile] glitteryv
The Amazing Mr. X (YouTube)

A 1948 horror noir from Eagle-Lion Films.

Christine (played by Lynn Bari) is a rich widow who believes that someone from the great beyond is trying to contact her. Janet, her sister (played by Cathy O'Donnell) repeatedly tells Christine that she's imagining things. They live in a big house by a cliff and the combination of the waves from the sea below and the wind results in strange noises.

However, Christine is not convinced. One night, she's walking down the beach, on her way to her boyfriend Martin's house (played by Richard Carlson) for dinner. She begins to hear the voices again. It puts her in a weird emotional moment. Just as she's starting to get a hold of herself, she runs into a guy named Alexis (played by Turhan Bey). This dude tells her that his powers led him to her and that he wants to help. He drops a few details abt her and her husband that he shouldn't know cuz he and Christine had never met before.

Afterwards, she asks Martin for a raincheck. After she calms down, he proposes to her. Once Martin leaves for his home, she begins to see and hear more stuff. She sits down with Janet and they agree to visit Alexis to see what he can do to help them.

A seance occurs…

This is an interesting movie in that it's half gothic horror and half film noir. There's the supernatural aspect including ghosts, seances, the idea of a love that goes beyond life and death, etc. Meanwhile, for the film noir, the main themes are obsession and fate. The cinematography (by John Alton) is moody AF.

All of the actors were fine (tho no one stood out for me.)


Do I have any criticisms?

Yeppers. I do feel that the story has uneven pacing after Christine and Alexis meet. Sometimes things take forever to happen, others things seem to speed up.

Even though this is mostly built as a film noir, IMO, it's more a gothic suspense movie. So I'm v. ??? as to why ppl keep bringing this movie up whenever someone asks for film noir recs. YMMV.


SPOILERS FOR THE ENDINGPerhaps I'm overthinking this, but I was disappointed by some aspects of the ending.

So the first half of the movie is abt Christine. But then, the plot jumps lanes and the focus shifts to another character all the way to the end. Which is odd. I wish the movie had been abt the other character to begin with.

Especially cuz I wanted some more info on Christine as the movie came into a close. She's been put thru the wringer psychologically speaking AND survives a truly dark moment. It's also hinted at (some 15-20 mins before the movie ends) that she's having suicidal ideations too. The rest of the characters don't seem concerned abt that? Given everything that happens to her, I don't see Christine having a happy ending.

IDK. It was unnerving cuz there's no closure to her character one way or another.



Do I recommend it?

#Unsure. It's not a bad movie, but I can't rec it as a full noir. So, I'm giving it a 2.1 out of 5.

Queerness level:

*Shakes head no*



Le trailer

Community Recs Post!

Nov. 13th, 2025 10:23 am
glitteryv: (Default)
[personal profile] glitteryv posting in [community profile] recthething
Every Thursday, we have a community post, just like this one, where you can drop a rec or five in the comments.

This works great if you only have one rec and don't want to make a whole post for it, or if you don't have a DW account, or if you're shy. ;)

(But don't forget: you can deffo make posts of your own seven days a week. ;D!)

So what cool fanvids/fics/fancrafts/fanart/podfics/other kinds of fanworks have we discovered this week? Drop it in the comments below. Anon comment is enabled.

BTW, AI fanworks are not eligible for reccing at recthething. If you aware that a fanwork is AI-generated, please do not rec it here
glitteryv: (Default)
[personal profile] glitteryv
The Chase (YouTube)

A 1946 movie from Nero Films and directed by Arthur Ripley. It's based on the novel The Black Path of Fear by Cornell Woolrich.

The movie is abt Chuck Scott (played by Robert Cummings), a down on his luck WW2 veteran who, thru an act of kindness, ends up as the chauffeur for a Miami gangster called Eddie Roman (played by Steve Cochran). Now with a steady job and a place to live, Chuck is doing okay! That is, until he forms a bond with Lorna (played by Michèle Morgan)--who just happens to be Eddie's wife…

Actingwise, things are solid. Cummings and Peter Lorre (as Eddie's right hand man Gino) are good. Cochran plays his gangster role with this suave vibe who will turn violent in an instant. I like how he plays Eddie in a way that will unsettle viewers; he also has a v. magnetic persona.

Do I have any criticisms?

The plot feels like two movies in one (and not in a good way). With the first half being verrrrrry noirish as the suspense keeps building up. Then something happens that has the story change lanes in a way that made me MUPPET FACE at the screen.

Lorna as a character was uninteresting. I'm not sure if it was the direction or Morgan's own acting limits or what. She had a couple of good scenes with Cochran and then I'd be like "whatever, girl."


Do I recommend it?

I do as long as you accept that the movie will take a sharp turn. It's also only an hour and 30. I"m giving it a 2.1 out of 5. I didn't feel like I wasted my time watching it, but it's not one I'll rewatch any time soon or, like, ever.

Queerness level:

An argument can be made for Gino's closeness and protectiveness toward Eddie. At least, the way Lorre plays him. YMMV.


Le trailer

current fandom events

Nov. 11th, 2025 11:01 pm
svgurl: (star trek: kirk/spock tos & xi)
[personal profile] svgurl
[community profile] werewolvesden is a community dedicated to any fandom or media that related to werewolves or other wereanimals or shapeshifters

[community profile] thylabang is a multi-verse Kirk/Spock community hosting future event series.

[community profile] allbingo is running Fairy Tales and Fantasy Stories Fest through the month of November. There are pre-made cards or you can create your own based on the available prompts.

[community profile] smallfandomfest has opened prompting for its 38th Small Fandoms Fest until November 21st.

[community profile] smallfandomfest is open for another round of Pimp Your Small Fandom.

[community profile] exesandohsexchange, an exchange based on the exes to lovers trope (though the ship doesn't have to canonically be exes to qualify), is open for sign-ups until November 14th, 11:59PM, 11:59PM Eastern. Nominations are also still open until November 13th, 11:59PM Eastern too.

[community profile] consent_issues_exchange, an exchange for works with a focus on dubious and non-consensual sex, has opened sign-ups until November 22nd, 10PM EST.

[community profile] rec_cember, a community for a month long rec event that will take place in December, is open for sign-ups.

[community profile] fancake's theme of the month is: mystery and suspense. Click on the banner below to learn more!

Moody photograph of the ocean from an outlook. In the foreground, two dirty hands claw their way up over the edge toward the viewer. Text: Mystery & Suspense, at Fancake.

movies

Nov. 11th, 2025 11:13 am
snickfic: b/w still of Grace Le Domas in her wedding dress (Grace Ready or Not)
[personal profile] snickfic
A lot of meh here.

Crash (1996). A man and his wife get involved in the car crash fetish scene. I really don't think "erotic thriller" is adequate preparation for this movie, but then again I'm not sure what is. I recently saw this described as "a series of sex scenes separated by car crashes," and that's about right.

I liked:
- The completely normalized polyamory. This married couple get off on fucking other people and telling each other about it, good for them.
- That it was a lot gayer than I expected, especially for 1996. Both m/m and f/f scenes (even if the latter felt a bit out of nowhere).

I was disappointed by:
- James Spader. THIS is James Spader? This is the guy everyone is low-key obssessed with? This gormless Zach Gilford lookalike?
- How we open with the wife, but the husband gets all the development, and she just gets pulled along in his wake. She seems to enjoy it, but I wanted to see her take some initiative, too.
- Somehow I'd osmosed that there was like car-related body mod stuff, like Cronenberg's version of Tetsuo: The Iron Man. The one gal with the leg brace was not really sufficient for my tastes.

--

Predator: Badlands (2025). A Yautja runt goes on a quest to kill an unkillable monster to avenge(?) his brother's death at his father's hands, and ends up teaming up with a Weyland-Yutani synth (Elle Fanning) with no legs.

This is by the same guy who directed Prey, Dan Trachtenberg. The writing felt more obvious and more cobbled-together than that movie, probably because it was trying to do more. I got tired of people stating the same obvious story beat multiple times.

I think this is the first time the Yautja have been humanized to nearly this degree, right? I've only seen Prey and the AvP movies, so I may be missing some lore. I'm not sure what I needed from a race of big game hunters was daddy issues, but otoh murderous patriarchy does go hand in hand with the big game hunting, I guess. IDK, I wanted the Yautja in general and our specimen in particular to be weirder.

However, I eventually enjoyed Thia the synth, who has a kind of anti-Gamora/Nebula relationship with a fellow synth. It passed the Bechdel test, good job! And the movie had some fantastic deadly alien fauna. Just completely bonkers creatures that want to kill you in the most unlikely ways. A+.

--

Die My Love (2025). A woman (Jennifer Lawrence) moves with her husband (Robert Pattinson) to his rural family home, has a baby, and has a mental breakdown.

My impression of this movie from the trailer was that this was maybe about a couple's relationship slowly escalating to bonkers attempted murder. (Pattinson's presence definitely contributed to my impression of it being bonkers.) There was no baby in the trailer I saw, and if there had been I wouldn't have gone to see it. That said, I don't know that it was ABOUT motherhood or post-partum depression or about the marital relationship. Frankly, I cannot confidently say what it was about. The choice of first and last shots suggest it's about the house?

I can't say it's not bonkers, but more in terms of its storytelling choices than its content as such. The timeline is weird and confused, but not in an interesting way. We learn literally nothing about the main character's background until about the 80% mark. (She was orphaned at age 10? Might be good to mention that earlier??)

Some of what we see on screen probably isn't happening. The ending, where she walks naked into a forest fire, I feel almost certainly didn't happen. There's a recurring theme where she prowls around on the ground but also might be pretending to be a horse? Also there's a horse that just wanders around and which they hit with their car at one point? (To be fair, it's not the first movie this year where a thematically significant horse just wanders through now and then. Looking at you, On Swift Horses.)

To be honest, JLaw was the biggest draw of this movie for me, and I did get plenty of her. It's a JLaw showcase, and I also enjoyed Sissy Spacek in a supporting role. But overall, man. I ventured outside my usual genre, and I had regrets!
glitteryv: (Default)
[personal profile] glitteryv
Farewell, My Lovely

A 1975 adaptation of Dashiell Hammett's novel by the same name.

Just like with The Big Sleep, I read that novel some 20 yrs ago. I've watched (and own in physical format) the 1944 movie that was originally titled Murder, My Sweet. That movie starred Dick Powell and Claire Trevor.

Out of the two versions, the 1944 adaptation is the more faithful one to the novel. So, when compared to the 1975 film, there are some differences, but the overall storyline remained mostly the same. Acting and plot are good in both.

In this movie, Philip Marlowe (played by Robert Mitchum here and Dick Powell in the 1944 movie) is a private detective in 1941. He's not doing great, but he's deffo busy. The bulk of his cases tend to be abt cheating spouses or (like it happens at the start of the movie) finding missing people.

As soon as he returns a teenage runaway girl to her parents, he gets 'hired' by Moose Malloy (a thug who has just been released from prison for robbing $80k from a bank 7 yrs prior.) Malloy orders Marlowe to find his sweetheart, a woman named Velma, who was a dancer at a seedy bar. So Marlowe starts snooping around. The more he works the case, the wilder the search becomes until he senses that there's a bigger thing happening he hasn't quite connected the dots yet.

This is a REALLY GOOD movie. Extremely classic noir featuring Mitchum's Marlowe who has a frenemies situation with the police chief and Charlotte Rampling--who, at that time, was 29 y.o.--as Helen. She's a v. sensual, rich, and bored housewife. It's interesting that everything from her styling to her affectation and her voice is v., reminiscent of 1940s Lauren Baccall. Rampling does a good job as the femme fatale. (For context, the fabulous Claire Trevor, who played the same role in the 1944 movie, was slightly better, but I digress.) Rampling and Mitchum have a slow-burning intensity that works well considering Rampling's doing the most she can to embody the 1940s vamp and Mitchum (who was in his late 50s) starred in a lot of those 1940s noirs. I liked their interactions. Even though Helen was a little too much at times. Girl was horny, lordy lorde. XD

There are 2 differences between the 1944 and 1975 versions.

1. Because this movie was filmed after the Code was struck down, ppl curse, there are plenty of boobs (such as a scene in which Marlowe opens doors while searching for someone and finds different groups of ppl in which all of the women are topless), and the violence is more graphic (again, bullet wounds, blood, ppl getting punched and slapped.).

2. Also certain details: a character got genderswapped, two characters never show up (they were main characters), and two new characters were created for the movie. It was a bit confusing, but it worked for me. Oh, and out of nowhere, a v., v. young Sylvester Stallone shows up as a secondary character that's a thug dude. It was hilarious to see baby!Stallone, IDK.

It's not a perfect movie. There was one character that had a connection to the Big Bad, but I didn't quite understand how this partnership worked.

Do I recommend it? YES! If you're a fan of film noir or crime movies in general, this one will be a treat for sure. Content Warning for a lot of racial slurs in some scenes, on-screen violence against women, and some graphic stuff. I'm giving it a 4.5 out of 5.

Queerness level

There's a female character who is v. explicitly a lesbian. However, she's also an abuser and overall terrible person.


P.S.: One funny thing abt this movie being filmed in 1975 but depicting 1941 is that it'd be as if a movie coming out in 2025 that was set in 1990. I was a teenager in 1991! WHAT IS TIME?! O__o


Le trailer

Profile

learnedfoot: Spider-Man (Default)
learnedfoot

January 2024

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Nov. 20th, 2025 11:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios